CDA Declares Bari Imam House Illegally Occupied Property

CDA Declares Bari Imam House Illegally Occupied Property

Table of Contents

Before the Islamabad High Court (IHC), the Capital Development Authority (CDA) has contested the legal standing of a structure known as “Bari Imam House,” arguing that it is not legally connected to the shrine of Hazrat Bari Imam and that it is located on land that the authority purchased in 1963.

The authority argued that the contested building is not included in its official acquisition or revenue records in a written filing submitted through attorney Kashif Ali Malik. Additionally, it contested the petitioner’s ownership claims, claiming that there is no legitimate title or permission to use or occupy the land.

Disputed Property Linked to Five Khasra Numbers

According to the CDA, the disputed land in Mauza Noorpur Shahan includes Khasra Nos. 435, 582, 591, 592, and 593.

Its response states that the land was purchased under Award No. 4/DC CDA/1963, after which the pertinent proprietors received compensation and other acceptable benefits.

The administration added that there is no mention of a building or establishment using the name “Bari Imam House” in its acquisition records. Because of this, the CDA has declared the current occupation to be unlawful.

CDA Clarifies Location of Hazrat Bari Imam Shrine

The connection between the contested structure and the shrine of Hazrat Bari Imam has also been contested by the authorities.

The genuine shrine, also called Darbar, is located on distinct territory that includes Khasra Nos. 277, 665, 677, 678, 679, and 680, according to the CDA’s statement.

These properties, which are across the street from the contested building, are allegedly registered in the name of Darbar Aalia Hazrat Bari Abdul Latif Shah (R.A.).

The shrine and Bari Imam House, according to the CDA, are two different properties with different land and legal documents. It argued that ownership rights over the contested property are not established by the building’s affiliation with the shrine.

Authority Questions Petitioner’s Right to Occupy Property

In addition to challenging the property’s ownership claims, the CDA has questioned the court’s ability to uphold the constitutional petition.

The authority has contested the petitioner’s legal status, claiming that the building’s occupation is not supported by any proven ownership, title, or legal authorization.

The court has not yet made a decision regarding these issues, which are included in the CDA’s written response.

CDA Seeks Early Hearing Following IHC Order

The submission follows an IHC order dated November 3, 2026, directing the relevant authorities to de-seal the building while restraining its demolition until the next hearing.

In response to the order, the CDA asked that the case be heard before the January 18, 2027, hearing date.

The authority suggested holding a hearing the week starting on November 9, 2026, to discuss its stance on the property’s ownership documents, acquisition history, and legal status.

The Islamabad High Court will now review the conflicting claims and decide the legal issues pertaining to the building’s occupation and any potential connection to the shrine of Hazrat Bari Imam.

Tags :

Share :

Picture of About Author
About Author

Syed Sadat Hussain Shah

Talk to Us!

Latest Posts

Categories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chat with us on WhatsApp